ABSTRACT
Objective@#Rapid identification of the cause for acute kidney injury (AKI) is very crucial. Among the diagnostic indicators of AKI, the fractional excretion rate of sodium (FENa) is clinically considered the most useful indicator. Numerous studies have reported that rapid identification and treatment of AKI improves the short-term clinical prognosis of AKI patients. However, insufficient studies have reported on the benefits of early assessment of FENa to help improve the mid-long term clinical prognosis of AKI patients. @*Methods@#We analyzed the timing of FENa in AKI patients who were admitted through our hospital emergency department, over a period of 3 years. The experimental groups are divided into the early group, measuring FENa within 3 hours after arrival in the emergency room, and the late group, measuring FENa later than 3 hours after arrival in the emergency room. The prognostic outcomes determined are major adverse kidney events (MAKE), including new dialysis, deterioration of kidney function to chronic kidney disease (CKD), and death, as well as MAKE and AKI recurrence (MAKER). @*Results@#Significant differences were obtained between the early group and late group in time taken to start fluid resuscitation (P=0.001), intermittent hemodialysis (P=0.005), and continuous renal replacement therapy (P=0.016), as well as in the mid-long term clinical prognosis of new dialysis (P=0.018) and deterioration of kidney function to CKD (P=0.004). Differences between early group and late group in MAKE (P<0.001) and MAKER (P<0.001) were also statistically significant. In the mid-long term clinical prognosis of death (P=0.706) and AKI recurrence (P=0.466), no significant differences were obtained between the two groups. @*Conclusion@#Early measurement of FENa (within 3 hours) for AKI patients visiting the emergency room showed better mid-long term clinical prognosis than patients with delayed FENa measurement.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#Rapid identification of the cause for acute kidney injury (AKI) is very crucial. Among the diagnostic indicators of AKI, the fractional excretion rate of sodium (FENa) is clinically considered the most useful indicator. Numerous studies have reported that rapid identification and treatment of AKI improves the short-term clinical prognosis of AKI patients. However, insufficient studies have reported on the benefits of early assessment of FENa to help improve the mid-long term clinical prognosis of AKI patients. @*Methods@#We analyzed the timing of FENa in AKI patients who were admitted through our hospital emergency department, over a period of 3 years. The experimental groups are divided into the early group, measuring FENa within 3 hours after arrival in the emergency room, and the late group, measuring FENa later than 3 hours after arrival in the emergency room. The prognostic outcomes determined are major adverse kidney events (MAKE), including new dialysis, deterioration of kidney function to chronic kidney disease (CKD), and death, as well as MAKE and AKI recurrence (MAKER). @*Results@#Significant differences were obtained between the early group and late group in time taken to start fluid resuscitation (P=0.001), intermittent hemodialysis (P=0.005), and continuous renal replacement therapy (P=0.016), as well as in the mid-long term clinical prognosis of new dialysis (P=0.018) and deterioration of kidney function to CKD (P=0.004). Differences between early group and late group in MAKE (P<0.001) and MAKER (P<0.001) were also statistically significant. In the mid-long term clinical prognosis of death (P=0.706) and AKI recurrence (P=0.466), no significant differences were obtained between the two groups. @*Conclusion@#Early measurement of FENa (within 3 hours) for AKI patients visiting the emergency room showed better mid-long term clinical prognosis than patients with delayed FENa measurement.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#The rapid identification and treatment of an acute kidney injury (AKI) can help to restore the kidney function. To differentiate between pre-renal AKI and intrinsic AKI, a urine chemistry test was performed to determine the function of the renal tubules. On the other hand, there is no report showing that it is helpful to arrive at the hospital as early as possible and to perform these urine chemistry tests as soon as possible. @*Methods@#This study analyzed the timing of urinary chemistry tests in AKI patients who were admitted to the author’s hospital through the emergency departments (ED) in the last three years and divided into two groups. The early group was defined as patients who performed the test within three hours of arrival in the ED. The late group was defined as patients who were late or not. The prognostic factors were the change in 30-day estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and duration of hospital stay. @*Results@#The changes of eGFR after 30 days in each group were 41.6±27.57 mL/min/1.73 m2 (early group, n=92) vs. 30.39±26.37 mL/min/1.73 m2 (late group, n=180) (P=0.001). Early group patients were discharged more quickly than patients in the late group (hospital day, 11.49±10.14 vs. 13.84±10.53; P=0.041). @*Conclusion@#A urine chemistry test is a test to help determine the cause of AKI. Based on the results of urine chemistry performed within three hours after arrival at the hospital, patients with AKI who visited the emergency room had betterimproved kidney function and less hospitalization time than the patients who were late or untested at the time of treatment.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#The rapid identification and treatment of an acute kidney injury (AKI) can help to restore the kidney function. To differentiate between pre-renal AKI and intrinsic AKI, a urine chemistry test was performed to determine the function of the renal tubules. On the other hand, there is no report showing that it is helpful to arrive at the hospital as early as possible and to perform these urine chemistry tests as soon as possible. @*Methods@#This study analyzed the timing of urinary chemistry tests in AKI patients who were admitted to the author’s hospital through the emergency departments (ED) in the last three years and divided into two groups. The early group was defined as patients who performed the test within three hours of arrival in the ED. The late group was defined as patients who were late or not. The prognostic factors were the change in 30-day estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and duration of hospital stay. @*Results@#The changes of eGFR after 30 days in each group were 41.6±27.57 mL/min/1.73 m2 (early group, n=92) vs. 30.39±26.37 mL/min/1.73 m2 (late group, n=180) (P=0.001). Early group patients were discharged more quickly than patients in the late group (hospital day, 11.49±10.14 vs. 13.84±10.53; P=0.041). @*Conclusion@#A urine chemistry test is a test to help determine the cause of AKI. Based on the results of urine chemistry performed within three hours after arrival at the hospital, patients with AKI who visited the emergency room had betterimproved kidney function and less hospitalization time than the patients who were late or untested at the time of treatment.